| 24 | 0 | 13 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
本试验旨在探究可溶性有机碳肥(SOC)对烤烟生理生化和品质特征的影响。采用田间试验法,以‘中烟100’为供试品种,设置CK(对照,常规施肥)、T1(常规施肥+300 kg/hm2 SOC)、T2(常规施肥+600 kg/hm2 SOC)和T3(常规施肥+900 kg/hm2 SOC)共4个施肥处理,测定不同处理下烤烟农艺性状、根系指标、光合作用、组织结构、抗氧化酶及碳氮代谢酶活性和烤后烟叶品质。结果表明,施加SOC能促进烤烟生长,农艺性状、根系和光合性能较CK均有所提高,组织结构更加整齐明显;提高烟叶抗氧化酶活性,降低丙二醛(MDA)和过氧化氢(H_2O2)含量,其中以移栽后60 d时T2处理效果最好,超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化物酶(POD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性较CK分别提高37.71%、56.73%和49.18%;提高碳氮代谢酶活性,且以移栽后60 d时T2处理活性最高,蔗糖合酶(SS)、蔗糖磷酸合酶(SPS)、硝酸还原酶(NR)、亚硝酸还原酶(NIR)活性较CK分别提高30.11%、33.27%、53.42%、27.09%;施加SOC改善烤后烟叶品质,外观质量、感官质量和化学成分更加协调,以T2处理综合效果最好,T1、T2和T3处理的有机酸总量较CK分别增加5.60%、13.60%和5.41%。综上所述,施用SOC可以促进烤烟生长,提高抗氧化酶和碳氮代谢酶活性,改善烤后烟叶品质,本试验条件下以600 kg/hm2用量效果最佳。
Abstract:This experiment was designed to investigate the effects of soluble organic carbon fertilizer(SOC) on physiological and biochemical and quality characteristics of flue-cured tobacco. Four treatments, CK(control, conventional fertilization), T1(conventional fertilization + 300 kg/hm2 SOC), T2(conventional fertilization + 600 kg/hm2 SOC) and T3(conventional fertilization + 900 kg/hm2 SOC), were set to study their effects on agronomic traits, root indexes, photosynthesis, tissue structure, activities of antioxidant enzymes and carbon and nitrogen metabolisming enzymes, and quality of cured leaves of flue-cured tobacco. The results showed that the application of SOC could promote the growth of flue-cured tobacco, and the agronomic traits, root system and photosynthetic indexes were improved compared with CK, and the tissue structure was more neat and obvious; the application of SOC improved the activity of antioxidant enzymes, and lowered the content of malondialdehyde(MDA) and H_2O2, among which, the T2 treatment had the best effect at 60 days after transplanting, and the activity of superoxide dismutase(SOD), peroxide(POD) and catalase(CAT) increased by 37.71%, 56.73% and 49.18% compared with that of CK. SOC application also improved the activity of carbon and nitrogen metabolisming enzymes, and that of T2 treatment at 60 days after transplanting was the highest, with sucrose synthase(SS), sucrose phosphate synthase(SPS), nitrate reductase(NR) and nitrite reductase(NIR) activities increased by 30.11%, 33.27%, 53.42% and 27.09%, respectively, compared with CK. SOC application improved the quality of post-baking tobacco leaves, with better harmonization of appearance quality, sensory quality and chemical composition, and T2 treatment had the best comprehensive effects. The total content of organic acids of T1, T2 and T3 treatments increased by 5.60%, 13.60% and 5.41%, respectively, compared with CK. In conclusion, SOC application could promote the growth of tobacco leaves, increase the activities of antioxidant enzymes and carbon and nitrogen metabolizing enzymes, and improve the quality of cured tobacco leaves. The best effect was achieved with 600 kg/hm2 SOC application.
[1] 梁利宝,洪坚平.不同菌肥施用量对矿区复垦土壤氮、有机质的影响[J].广西农业科学,2008,39(5):636-638.
[2] 罗伟.生物有机肥穴施对烤烟生长及产质量的影响[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2017.
[3] 薄国栋,杨斌,黄广华,等.生物有机肥对植烟土壤及烤烟生长发育影响研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2020,48(18):23-25.
[4] 向清慧,肖汉乾,杨坤,等.有机碳肥在作物生产上的应用研究进展[J].作物研究,2020,34(2):196-200.
[5] 朱昌雄,李瑞波.液态有机碳肥概述[J].磷肥与复肥,2013,28(4):16-18.
[6] 李俊鹏,陈日远,刘厚诚,等.有机碳肥对叶用莴苣生长品质及碳氮代谢酶活性的影响[J].中国蔬菜,2023(1):98-103.
[7] 常剑波,严定伟,蒋海洋,等.有机碳肥对植烟土壤细菌群落结构和烤烟产质量的影响[J].山东农业科学,2024,56(11):83-91.
[8] 李铭,李俊.有机碳肥对油茶林地土壤养分和产量的影响[J].农业技术与装备,2024(11):88-89,92.
[9] 陈娜,李晓鹏,刘进法,等.不同种类有机碳肥对上海青产量和品质的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2024,52(3):151-153.
[10] Li P,Kong D N,Zhang H J,et al.Different regulation of soil structure and resource chemistry under animal- and plant-derived organic fertilizers changed soil bacterial communities[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2021,165(1):104020.
[11] 孙蕾,索全义,赵海宏,等.弱光照下喷施有机碳肥对小麦光合性能的影响[J].北方农业学报,2021,49(1):65-70.
[12] 周少猛,马海艳,郑顺林,等.有机碳肥对酚酸胁迫下马铃薯开花期叶片抗逆性的影响[J].四川农业大学学报,2019,37(6):836-841.
[13] 孙光伟,陈振国,王玉军,等.烤烟上部叶采收时SPAD值与鲜烟组织结构、生理指标及烤后烟叶内在质量的关系[J].中国烟草学报,2019,25(5):63-69,104.
[14] 张志良,翟伟菁,李小方.植物生理学实验指导[M].第4版.北京:高等教育出版社,2009.
[15] 金永明,张明福,刘百战.烟草中多元酸和高级脂肪酸的分析[J].烟草科技,2002(4):21-24.
[16] 蓝林,刘芸渟,莫碧霞,等.不同C/N有机碳肥对铝矿复垦地土壤肥力和桑树生长的影响[J].广西蚕业,2021,58(2):37-41.
[17] 樊保宁,丘立杭,游建华,等.有机碳肥对糖料甘蔗生长、产量形成及经济效益的影响[J].南方农业学报,2022,53(7):1893-1898.
[18] 姚文艺,高华军,黄阳,等.高碳基土壤修复肥对山地烤烟生长和产质量的影响[J].陕西农业科学,2018,64(2):38-40.
[19] Wang X S,Ren H L,Wei Z W,et al.Effects of neutral salt and alkali on ion distributions in the roots,shoots,and leaves of two alfalfa cultivars with differing degrees of salt tolerance[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2017,16(8):1800-1807.
[20] 崔红艳,许维成,孙毓民,等.施用有机肥对土壤水分、胡麻产量和品质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(3):307-312.
[21] 马超男,蔡传涛,刘贵周,等.有机肥对半夏生长及产量的影响[J].西北农业学报,2016,25(9):1399-1405.
[22] 贺维,胡庭兴,王锐,等.施肥对桢楠幼苗光合生理及生长特性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2014,34(6):1187-1197.
[23] 梁晓莹.有机肥与粉垄互作对土壤及甘蔗生长发育的影响[D].南宁:广西大学,2020.
[24] 张俊霞,刘晓鹏,向极钎.植物抗氧化系统对逆境胁迫的动态响应[J].湖北民族学院学报(自然科学版),2015,33(4):435-439.
[25] 蒋宇仙,向清慧,黄杰,等.施用液态有机碳肥对低温胁迫烟苗生长及生理生化特性的影响[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2021,47(4):399-405.
[26] 张嘉雯,卢绍浩,赵铭钦,等.施氮量对四川雪茄烟叶碳氮代谢及品质的影响[J].作物杂志,2021(4):159-165.
[27] Matic S,Åkerlund H E,Everitt E,et al.Sucrose synthase isoforms in cultured tobacco cells[J].Plant Physiol.Biochem.,2004,42(4):299-306.
[28] 赵会纳,高少凡,陈鹏,等.烟草碳氮代谢及其与烟草品质、抗逆性的关系研究进展[J].江西农业学报,2023,35(6):10-15.
[29] 桂丕,陈娴,廖宗文,等.不同氮水平下有机碳对蕹菜碳氮代谢及生长的影响[J].土壤学报,2016,53(3):746-756.
[30] 宋战锋,冯召,罗刚,等.不同配方高碳基有机肥对广西主要烟区烟叶产质量的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2023,51(22):168-177.
[31] 杨楠,王晓强,王明鑫,等.平顶山烟区烤烟品种Y2001农艺性状及烤后烟叶化学成分的初步研究[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2023,58(5):156-162.
[32] 宫长荣.烟草调制学[M].第二版.北京:中国农业出版社,2011.
[33] 赖燕华,汪军霞.有机酸对卷烟感官风格和品质的影响研究[J].分析测试学报,2015,34(6):696-700.
基本信息:
DOI:10.14083/j.issn.1001-4942.2026.04.017
中图分类号:S572
引用信息:
[1]闫奥函,王婧雅,李俊营,等.可溶性有机碳肥对烤烟生理生化和品质特征的影响[J].山东农业科学,2026,58(04):132-140.DOI:10.14083/j.issn.1001-4942.2026.04.017.
基金信息:
河南省自然科学基金项目“短期犁底层形成过程及其对土壤水肥运移的影响机制研究”(232300420219); 河南省烟草公司平顶山市公司项目“品牌导向型烟叶浓香特色彰显及质量提升技术研究与应用”(2023410000240385); 四川中烟工业有限责任公司项目“满足‘宽窄’品牌原料质量需求的烟叶成熟度数字化研究”(2023510000340442)
2025-01-21
2025
2025-12-29
2026-01-27
2026
2
2026-04-30
2026-04-30