nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 01, v.58 121-129
不同间作模式对茶园土壤及茶树木质部解剖结构特征的影响
基金项目(Foundation): 云南省教育厅基金项目(2024J0670); 云南省重大科技专项(202002AA100007); 国家林业和草原局科技项目(2019130004-149)
邮箱(Email): 317924340@swfu.edu.cn;lanzengquan@tsinghua.org.cn;
DOI: 10.14083/j.issn.1001-4942.2026.01.015
摘要:

为探究不同间作模式对茶园土壤及茶树[Camellia sinenesis(L.) O. Kuntze]木质部解剖结构的影响,本研究在云南省大理州南涧县无量山樱花谷风景区选择三种不同的茶园间作模式即马缨花(Rhododendron delavayi Franch.)-茶(MT)、冬樱花[Prunus cerasoides(D. Don) Sok.]-茶(DT)、核桃(Juglans mandshurica Maxim.)-茶(HT)与纯茶园(CK)进行比较,分析春、秋两季四种茶园土壤酶活性、土壤养分含量及茶树木质部解剖结构差异等。结果表明:与CK相比,春、秋季MT、DT茶园土壤酶活性总体提升效果较好,而HT茶园土壤酶活性提升效果较差;秋季,DT、MT、HT茶园总体上都能提升土壤有机质、全磷和全钾含量,改善茶园土壤理化性状;DT、HT茶园较CK显著提高茶树木质部导管长度;春季,HT茶园茶树木质部纤维长度、纤维宽度、双壁厚度和胞腔宽度等指标值均明显高于其他三种模式茶树;秋季,MT茶园茶树木质部纤维各指标值均为最大,其中纤维长度、双璧厚度与其他茶园差异达显著水平。综上表明,茶园中间作其他树种能够在一定程度上改善茶园土壤理化性状,提升茶树对水分和养分的利用效率,因此在茶园建设时可采用适宜的间作模式。

Abstract:

This study investigated the effects of different intercropping patterns on tea garden soil and xylem structure of tea tree [Camellia sinenesis( L.) O. Kuntze]. Three intercropping patterns including Rhododendron delavayi Franch. with tea tree(MT), Prunus cerasoides(D. Don) Sok. with tea tree(DT), Juglans mandshurica Maxim. with tea tree(HT) were selected to compare with the pure tea plantation(CK) in the Cherry Valley Scenic Area of Wuliang Mountain in Nanjian County, Dali Prefecture, Yunnan Province. Activity of soil enzymes, content of soil nutrients, and xylem anatomy traits of tea tree were analyzed in spring and autumn. The results indicated that compared with CK, MT and DT treatments generally enhanced the activity of tea garden soil enzymes in both seasons, whereas HT showed limited improvement. All intercropping patterns(DT, MT and HT) increased the content of soil organic matter, total phosphorus and total potassium in autumn, thereby improving soil physical and chemical properties in tea garden. DT and HT intercropping mode significantly increased the xylem vessel length of tea tree. In spring, the fiber length, fiber width, double wall thickness and lumen width of tea tree xylem in HT pattern were significantly higher than those in the other three patterns. In autumn, the indexes of xylem fiber of tea tree in MT garden were the highest, and the difference in fiber length and double wall thickness reached significant level. In conclusion, intercropping with other tree species could improve the soil properties of tea garden to a certain extent, and enhance the water and nutrient use efficiency of tea tree, so suitable intercropping patterns could be adopted during tea garden construction.

参考文献

[1] 闵天禄.山茶属的系统大纲[J].云南植物研究,1999,21(2):149-159.

[2] 李艳春,陈志鹏,林伟伟,等.茶树连作障碍形成机制及调控措施研究进展[J].生态科学,2019,38(5):225-232.

[3] Tseng W Y,Lai H Y.Comprehensive analysis revealed the specific soil properties and foliar elements respond to the quality composition levels of tea (Camellia sinensis L.)[J].Agronomy,2022,12(3):670.

[4] Siddiqui Y,Islam T M,Naidu Y,et al.The conjunctive use of compost tea and inorganic fertiliser on the growth,yield and terpenoid content of Centella asiatica (L.) urban[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2011,130(1):289-295.

[5] 周琳,艾应伟.川西高寒地区不同海拔高度土壤酶活性特征研究[J].四川大学学报(自然科学版),2023,60(3):166-170.

[6] 叶江华,张奇,林生,等.大红袍茶树生长及鲜叶品质与土壤特性的相关性[J].森林与环境学报,2019,39(5):488-496.

[7] 何钢,袁德义,刘贤桂.油茶低产林土壤改良对土壤养分及土壤酶活的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2011,31(3):76-80.

[8] 王叶,张国林,阳树英,等.生境对茶叶品质和产量影响的光合生理机制[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(11):3596-3606.

[9] Jiang Y L,Wang X J,Zhao Y M,et al.Effects of biochar application on enzyme activities in tea garden soil[J].Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology,2021,9:728530.

[10] Gao S L,He P,Lin T X,et al.Consecutive soybean (Glycine max) planting and covering improve acidified tea garden soil[J].PLoS ONE,2021,16(7):e0254502.

[11] Wang H M,Wu L Z,Zhou M S,et al.Influence of chestnut-tea tree intercropping to growth of tea trees and tea quality in northern China[J].Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology,2005,26(2):139.

[12] 段玉,邢弘擎,刘国栋,等.茶树-绿豆/大豆间作对茶园土壤和茶叶品质的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2022,45(3):511-520.

[13] 王金凤,周琦,吕玉龙,等.间作景观树种对茶园生态系统与茶叶生产的影响[J].浙江农业学报,2023,35(3):523-533.

[14] 肖秀丹,黄有成,汤星,等.不同间作方式对茶园生态环境及鲜茶叶品质的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2023,51(11):25-32.

[15] 沈辉,张静,彭兰,等.琵琶柴和沙拐枣茎的木质部结构的差异性及空间变异特征[J].干旱区研究,2023,40(12):1996-2006.

[16] 张永福,韩丽,刘佳妮,等.葡萄木质部解剖结构与树体营养及生长势的关系[J].东北农业大学学报,2015,46(1):34-40,46.

[17] 李润,朱丹丹,蒋梦莹,等.海桑次生木质部导管解剖特征与土壤理化因子年内动态变化的关系研究[J].西北植物学报,2018,38(2):282-290.

[18] 郑国琦,赵猛,张磊,等.灌水量对枸杞根茎次生木质部结构和组成的影响[J].西北植物学报,2010,30(11):2170-2176.

[19] 木巴热克·阿尤普,杨波,艾沙江·买买提,等.基于当年生枝木质部解剖结构的扁桃品种栓塞抗性分析[J].西北林学院学报,2021,36(5):99-105.

[20] 李振高,骆永明,滕应.土壤与环境微生物研究法[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.

[21] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.

[22] 中华人民共和国农业部.茶叶产地环境技术条件:NY/T 853—2004[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2004.

[23] 叶协锋,杨超,李正,等.绿肥对植烟土壤酶活性及土壤肥力的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(2):445-454.

[24] Cong W F,Hoffland E,Li L,et al.Intercropping enhances soil carbon and nitrogen[J].Global Change Biology,2015,21(4):1715-1726.

[25] 田永辉.人工生态茶园有机质和氮磷钾动态变化研究[J].茶叶,2001,27(3):27-30.

[26] 宋同清,王克林,彭晚霞,等.亚热带丘陵茶园间作白三叶草的生态效应[J].生态学报,2006,26(11):3647-3655.

[27] Guo J H,Liu X J,Zhang Y,et al.Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands[J].Science,2010,327(5968):1008-1010.

[28] 田洪敏,罗美玲,杨雪梅,等.茶树-核桃树间作模式对茶园土壤养分的影响[J].热带作物学报,2019,40(4):657-663.

[29] 王倩,安贵阳,李世芳,等.不同覆盖模式对旱地苹果园土壤养分、微生物和酶活性的影响[J].西北农业学报,2015,24(7):69-74.

[30] 郑玉婷,黄鑫慧,李浩,等.有机和常规管理对茶园土壤固碳的影响:以林地为对照[J].中国生态农业学报:中英文,2024,32(1):53-60.

[31] 张国林.茶树-乔木间种对茶叶产量和品质的影响及机理[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2019.

[32] 田亚玲.银杏和茶树复合经营系统生理生态效应研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2012.

[33] 刘荣贵,邓茂桦,张瀚文,等.内生真菌对醉马草不同生长期土壤酶活性和养分的影响[J].草地学报,2024,32(6):1770-1778.

[34] 孙愚琛,吴俊颖,任薪芳,等.外源硒肥对黄精生长及其根际土壤养分和酶活性的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2023(11):164-172.

[35] 陈凯威,张仕彬,徐凯,等.不同有机肥替代化肥比对井冈蜜橘品质和土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2023(12):97-106.

[36] 王理德,王方琳,郭春秀,等.土壤酶学硏究进展[J].土壤,2016,48(1):12-21.

[37] Lima A C,da Silva Andrade S C,Gerolamo C S,et al.Liana attachment to supports leads to profound changes in xylem anatomy and transcriptional profile of cambium and differentiating xylem[J].Plant,Cell & Environment,2024,47(12):5172-5188.

[38] Jiang G F,Qin B T,Pang Y K,et al.Limited effects of xylem anatomy on embolism resistance in cycad leaves[J].New Phytologist,2024,243(4):1329-1346.

[39] 李泽东,陈志成,曹振,等.华北低山丘陵区常用树种木质部解剖特征及水其力学抗旱性[J].生态学报,2021,41(1):69-78.

[40] 刘青,王云霞,曾岩,等.不同林龄刺槐解剖结构及生理特性[J].应用生态学报,2023,34(12):3256-3262.

[41] 成俊卿,衛廣揚.针叶樹材解剖性质的记载要点和说明[J].植物学报,1957,6(1):53-72.

[42] Cornwell W K,Cornelissen J H C,Allison S D,et al.Plant traits and wood fates across the globe:rotted,burned,or consumed?[J].Global Change Biology,2009,15(10):2431-2449.

[43] Sperry J S.Evolution of water transport and xylem structure[J].International Journal of Plant Sciences,2003,164(S3):115-127.

[44] 梁永超,万辉,邱坚,等.9个桉树无性系木纤维径向变异研究[J].西部林业科学,2024,53(1):66-71,81.

基本信息:

DOI:10.14083/j.issn.1001-4942.2026.01.015

中图分类号:S571.1

引用信息:

[1]黄利超,扈月豪,陶燕蓝,等.不同间作模式对茶园土壤及茶树木质部解剖结构特征的影响[J].山东农业科学,2026,58(01):121-129.DOI:10.14083/j.issn.1001-4942.2026.01.015.

基金信息:

云南省教育厅基金项目(2024J0670); 云南省重大科技专项(202002AA100007); 国家林业和草原局科技项目(2019130004-149)

发布时间:

2026-01-30

出版时间:

2026-01-30

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文